• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 25; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 25; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX643T
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Patient Problem Hydrocephalus (3272)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection during the investigation, no significant deformations or damage of the valves was determined.Permeability test a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer control test to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer control testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valves operates within the accepted tolerance in both positions.Adjustment test the progav 2.0 was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is fully operational and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Internal inspection after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in progav 2.0 and shuntassistant 2.0.Results based on our investigation results, we can determine deposits.The deposits had no affect to the technical properties at the time of the investigation.The cause of the aforementioned functional impairment is not known to us at the time of the examination.Proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid can influence the function temporarily and are known side effects in hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shuntsystem (#fx643t) was implanted during a procedure.According to the complainant, the shunt system was believed to be operated in underdrainage and adjustment difficulties.The patient underwent a revision procedure.The complainant device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 1 year, 4 months.Height: 80 cm.Weight: 12 kg.Gender: male.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 25
Type of Device
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key18172771
MDR Text Key328559737
Report Number3004721439-2023-00348
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906502010
UDI-Public4041906502010
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K190174
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberFX643T
Device Catalogue NumberFX643T
Device Lot Number20056274
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/02/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/02/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/24/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age1 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight12 KG
-
-