C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT SLIM IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 1716000J |
Device Problems
Difficult to Insert (1316); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/10/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, 6f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, 6f are identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, when the dilator was used, but the tip was allegedly spread out.It was further reported that when cut off the tip and tried to use it, but allegedly could not be inserted properly.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, 6f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, 6f are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: one 6.5f introducer peel-apart sheath loaded onto dilator was returned for evaluation.Gross visual, microscopic visual, functional evaluations were performed.Material deformation was noted at the distal end of the peel-apart sheath.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported difficult to insert issue, as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event cannot be verified.However, the investigation is confirmed for the reported deformation due to compressive stress issue as the peel-apart sheath and dilator appeared to be bent and noted to be deformed.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: b5, g3 h11: h6 (method, result, conclusion) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, when the dilator was used, but the tip was allegedly spread out.It was further reported that when cut off the tip and tried to use it, but allegedly could not be inserted properly.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|