• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM CATRX ASPIRATION CATHETER; QEX, QEW

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM CATRX ASPIRATION CATHETER; QEX, QEW Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CATRXKIT
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/31/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned catrx confirmed that the catheter was fractured on its distal shaft.Further evaluation revealed that the guidewire lumen was damaged on its proximal end and stretching at the fractured site on the distal shaft.If the guidewire lumen is advanced distal to the tip of the non-penumbra sheath, it will allow the guidewire to prolapse.If this occurs, resistance may encounter during retraction of the catrx from the non-penumbra sheath.Retraction against this resistance would likely contribute to the guidewire lumen damage and stretching and fracture on the distal shaft of the catrx.Further evaluation revealed a proximal fracture and kinks throughout the length of the catheter and an ovalization on the catheter shaft.Based on the damage at the fractured location on the proximal shaft, the fracture on the proximal shaft was likely the result of a kink.If the catrx is advanced against resistance, damage such as a kink and subsequent fracture may occur.The kinks and ovalization were incidental to the complaint and likely occurred during removal from the patient body or packaging for return to penumbra.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the distal anterior tibial artery using an indigo system catrx aspiration catheter (catrx) and a non-penumbra sheath.During the procedure, the physician experienced resistance while advancing the catrx through the anatomy and decided to retract the catrx.However, upon retracting the catrx, the physician fractured the midshaft and distal end of the catrx.It was reported that the fractured distal end of the catrx had separated and remained in the patient¿s vessel.The physician then noticed the piece of the catrx that was in the vessel was fractured in two pieces.Therefore, the physician performed a cutdown surgery of the artery and removed the two fractured pieces of the catrx.The physician decided to do open embolectomy to complete the procedure.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INDIGO SYSTEM CATRX ASPIRATION CATHETER
Type of Device
QEX, QEW
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key18196099
MDR Text Key329570615
Report Number3005168196-2023-00527
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QEX
UDI-Device Identifier00814548017556
UDI-Public814548017556
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K220683
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,11/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberCATRXKIT
Device Lot NumberF00006470
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/06/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/31/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/22/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/25/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-