C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 9808560 |
Device Problems
Entrapment of Device (1212); Difficult to Remove (1528); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Obstruction of Flow (2423)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/31/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: d4 (expiry date: 08/2021).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that four years, nine months and twenty days post a port placement, the catheter was allegedly clogged.It was further reported that when tried to remove the catheter, the catheter was allegedly got stuck in the blood vessel and couldn't be removed.Reportedly, a schedule was planned for repeat removal as the catheter may have been broken.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one groshong catheter in two segments was received.Visual, microscopic visual and functional testing were performed.Thrombus with water was observed exiting the distal end of the catheter.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported catheter clog, removal difficulty and entrapment issues as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event cannot be verified.However, the investigation for the identified improper or incorrect procedure or method is confirmed as the patient tried to remove the catheter which was against the ifu.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.Instruction for use states: only qualified healthcare practitioners should insert, manipulate and remove these devices.H10: d4 (expiry date: 08/2021), g3, h6 (device) h11: h6 (method, result) h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that four years, nine months and twenty days post a port placement, the catheter was allegedly clogged.It was further reported that when tried to remove the catheter, the catheter was allegedly got stuck in the blood vessel and couldn't be removed.Reportedly, a schedule was planned for repeat removal as the catheter may have been broken.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|