• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 9808560
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Difficult to Remove (1528); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Obstruction of Flow (2423)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/31/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: d4 (expiry date: 08/2021).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that four years, nine months and twenty days post a port placement, the catheter was allegedly clogged.It was further reported that when tried to remove the catheter, the catheter was allegedly got stuck in the blood vessel and couldn't be removed.Reportedly, a schedule was planned for repeat removal as the catheter may have been broken.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one groshong catheter in two segments was received.Visual, microscopic visual and functional testing were performed.Thrombus with water was observed exiting the distal end of the catheter.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported catheter clog, removal difficulty and entrapment issues as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event cannot be verified.However, the investigation for the identified improper or incorrect procedure or method is confirmed as the patient tried to remove the catheter which was against the ifu.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.Instruction for use states: only qualified healthcare practitioners should insert, manipulate and remove these devices.H10: d4 (expiry date: 08/2021), g3, h6 (device) h11: h6 (method, result) h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
 
Event Description
It was reported that four years, nine months and twenty days post a port placement, the catheter was allegedly clogged.It was further reported that when tried to remove the catheter, the catheter was allegedly got stuck in the blood vessel and couldn't be removed.Reportedly, a schedule was planned for repeat removal as the catheter may have been broken.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key18208033
MDR Text Key328960270
Report Number3006260740-2023-05335
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K063377
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number9808560
Device Lot NumberRECR0973
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/01/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/27/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/04/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/01/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age57 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-