The product under investigation is not a serviceable device.Therefore, a service record review was not performed.However, the handpiece (hp) was returned for this investigation.A non-conformance based review of the serial number was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.A manufacturing device history record (dhr) review was performed prior to product release to ensure that the product was manufactured in compliance with the device master record.Based on the assessment, the product met release criteria.A review for complaints reported against this serial number was performed.No similar complaints were reported for the product serial under investigation.The hp was received for testing on this investigation.A visual inspection of the sample was conducted, and no defects or abnormalities were identified.The returned handpiece was connected to a calibrated infiniti.The handpiece was not recognized by the system.No further testing could be performed.The root cause of the reported ¿no handpiece recognition¿ can be attributed to a nonconforming eeprom.However, how or when the eeprom became nonconforming remains inconclusive.Based on the information obtained, the root cause of the reported event of ¿handpiece suction not working¿ is inconclusive.Manufacture will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|