Catalog Number 80219 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Leak/Splash (1354); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/06/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in left lower extremity artery, the catheter was allegedly found to be broken.It was further reported that the liquid leaked allegedly from the tip of the catheter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, photos and video were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in left lower extremity artery, the catheter was allegedly found to be damaged and allegedly had liquid leakage from the tip of the catheter.It was further reported that there is a slight breach in the catheter shell near the handle and the folds and bulges of the catheter shell.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation and hence physical investigation was not possible.The user provided information regarding tube damage and leak from the damaged tube place.User provided image and video show strong kink and damage of the tube, moreover the aspirated material was leaking from the damaged tube.The reported tube damage / break and leakage can be confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the tube damage and leakage.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: g3, h6 (device).H11: b5, h6 (method, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|