• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC ENDOWRIST; VESSEL SEALER EXTEND

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC ENDOWRIST; VESSEL SEALER EXTEND Back to Search Results
Model Number 480422-01
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 10/27/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the current information provided, the cause of the intraoperative complication cannot be determined.The product has not been returned to intuitive surgical, inc.(isi) for evaluation.A review of the advanced instrument log for the vessel sealer extend instrument associated with this event was performed by an isi failure analysis engineer (fae).Per the fae, there were no device logs available for this instrument.No integrated electrosurgical unit logs are available, as an erbe vio dv generator was used with this instrument.There do not appear to be any vse related errors in the system logs.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a da vinci-assisted lower right pulmonary lobectomy procedure, the vessel sealer extend (vse) instrument did not completely seal the target vessel, resulting in unexpected bleeding.At the time of the event, the surgeon was ligating and dividing the right lower lobe segmental (s6) pulmonary artery.The surgeon approached the segment 6 artery anteriorly and positioned the vse to take the vessel.He pressed the blue pedal to seal the vessel and then double-tapped the yellow pedal.Nothing was observed that would indicate insufficient sealing before the surgeon proceeded with the division of the vessel; the surgeon stated that the tissue was cut following the impression that a complete seal was achieved, including after the "seal completed" tones were heard for that seal attempt.At the time of the event, during the sealing sequence, audible signals were as expected, as they were throughout the instrument use.The surgeon could not remember if the seal cycle complete fast audible tones were heard, but he did not think anything sounded wrong at the time of the procedure.No errors were recorded when the issue occurred.However, only the distal end of the artery sealed, resulting in an immediate high-pressure bleed from the proximal end of the vessel.The surgeon quickly compressed the vessel with one of the universal surgical manipulators and then a swab.After several minutes, a weck clip was successfully applied to resolve the bleeding; however, due to the location of the clip and the subsequent need for tissue manipulations and parenchymal stapling near the area, extra care and time were devoted to avoiding accidentally dislodging the clip.The estimated blood loss as a result of this issue was recorded at 50ml in the suction bottle, plus the volume of blood in 2 wet patties.The patient reportedly recovered well, with no associated adverse effects, and they were discharged on postoperative day 3.The patient did not suffer any morbidity from the instrument failure.The procedure was completed, with no need for a conversion to a thoracotomy.No post-operative complications occurred.The surgeon chose to use the vse instrument, as the space was too small for a sureform staple; the tumor extended from the lower lobe to the upper lobe, it was close to the vessel, and the patient had fused fissures, which did not allow for stapler access.This may have meant that the vessel was under some tension during the sealing/cutting process, however, care was taken to relieve any unnecessary tension prior to proceeding with the use of the vse, and the tension during use would have been within the expected range for a successful sealing.Per a preoperative computed tomography scan, the segment 6 artery was 5.8mm in diameter.There was no evidence of vessel calcification, the tissue was not exposed to any radiation or chemotherapy prior to the procedure, and the jaws did not come into contact with a clip, suture, staple, or other metal objects when the reported issue was noted.The jaws were not immersed in liquid at any time; however, the vse had been previously used during the procedure, and the possibility of residual carbonized tissue could not be excluded.The surgeon could not remember any presence of tissue in the jaws, however, he could confirm that the jaws had not been wiped clean at any time during the procedure prior to the instrument failure.The surgeon could not be entirely sure what caused the vse issue, however he would consider the following 3 factors as contributing issues: the vessel diameter, the relative tension of the vessel, and the possibility of jaw contamination by carbonized tissue.The procedure was delayed by 30 mins in absolute numbers, however, the surgeon stated that the failure of the instrument had an overall effect on his confidence to proceed with further use of the instrument and in how tissues were handled from the moment of the failure onwards.The standard operating room procedure was followed regarding the inspection of the instrument prior to use, and no damage or anything out of the ordinary was reported by the or staff.The instrument had been used before on a small vein and had performed as expected.It was also used at the end of the procedure during station 4r lymph node dissection, on fat tissue, and on small feeding vessels, with no issues.The vse use times were recorded as follows: 28 mins, 47 mins, 1hr 14 mins, 1hr 20 mins, 1hr 23 mins, 1hr 31 mins (failure), 2hrs 5 mins, 2hrs 30 mins.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOWRIST
Type of Device
VESSEL SEALER EXTEND
Manufacturer (Section D)
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC
3410 central expressway
santa clara CA
Manufacturer (Section G)
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC
3410 central expressway
santa clara CA
Manufacturer Contact
izabel nielson
3410 central expressway
santa clara, CA 
4085232100
MDR Report Key18253037
MDR Text Key329549448
Report Number2955842-2023-20754
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NAY
UDI-Device Identifier10886874115661
UDI-Public(01)10886874115661(10)L84230609
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K173337
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/04/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number480422-01
Device Catalogue Number480422
Device Lot NumberL84230609 0182
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/04/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/01/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/08/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberISIFA2022-01-C
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
DA VINCI INSTRUMENTS AND ACCESSORIES.
-
-