Model Number CNS-6201A |
Device Problems
Device Alarm System (1012); No Audible Alarm (1019); Protective Measures Problem (3015)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/02/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The biomedical engineer (bme) reported that the central nurse's station (cns) did not alarm for bradycardia.No patient harm was reported.Nihon kohden continues to investigate the reported event.Nihon kohden will submit a supplemental report in accordance with 21 cfr section 803.56 when additional information becomes available.The following fields are not applicable (na) to the mdr report: b2, d4 lot number & expiration, d6a - d6b, d7b, f1 - f14, g4 device bla number g5, g7, h2, h7, and h9.The following fields contains no information (ni), as attempts to obtain information were made, but the information was not provided.A2 - a6.B6 - b7.D10 concomitant medical device.Attempt #1 11/20/2023 emailed customer via microsoft outlook for all items under the no information section.The customer responded back, but they did not provide the patient and additional device information as requested.
|
|
Event Description
|
The biomedical engineer (bme) reported that the central nurse's station (cns) did not alarm for bradycardia.No patient harm was reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Details of the complaint: the biomedical engineer (bme) reported that the central nurse's station (cns) did not alarm for bradycardia.No patient harm was reported.Investigation conclusion: review of the strips by nka clinical indicates that the bedside monitor should have triggered an alarm.To confirm if the device alarmed or not, the device logs would need to be analyzed.The customer was contacted to provide the device logs, but device logs were not provided in a timely manner.Due to the delay, the relevant data would no longer be present in the logs and the issue could not be confirmed.As such, it is likely that the alarm may have been triggered but was erroneously silenced by a clinician.A serial number review of the reported device does not reveal additional related complaints.Complaint history review of the customer's account does not reveal similar complaints for the reported device.The following fields are not applicable (na) to the mdr report: the following fields contains no information (ni), as attempts to obtain information were made, but the information was not provided.D10 concomitant medical device attempt #1: 11/20/2023 emailed customer via microsoft outlook for all items under the no information section.The customer responded back, but they did not provide the patient and additional device information as requested.Additional information: b4 date of this report.G3 date received by manufacturer.G6 type of report.H2 if follow-up, what type? h6 event problem and evaluation codes.H10 additional manufacturer narrative.
|
|
Event Description
|
The biomedical engineer (bme) reported that the central nurse's station (cns) did not alarm for bradycardia.No patient harm was reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|