• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION INC. LVIS D; INTRACRANIAL COIL-ASSIST STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION INC. LVIS D; INTRACRANIAL COIL-ASSIST STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Aneurysm (1708)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported through the article titled " retreatment with a pipeline embolization device for recanalized aneurysms following stent-assisted coiling embolization", this case series presents a retrospective single-center analysis of patients with recanalized aneurysms who underwent retreatment using the ped between july and april, subsequent to stent-assisted coiling embolization.The study includes five female patients, whose relevant clinical data were recorded.All patients had aneurysms located in the internal carotid artery, comprising two blood blister-like aneurysms and two giant aneurysms.Prior to the retreatment, two lvis stents, two enterprise stents, and one solitaire stent were implanted.Patient #1 a 49-year-old woman underwent stent-assisted coiling (lvis) for a p-comm blood blister-like aneurysm at another hospital 5 months ago.She was admitted to our hospital for treatment of recurrent aneurysm, which was diagnosed during a computed tomography angiography (cta) scan performed 2 weeks ago.Dsa revealed a recurrent aneurysm with a maximum diameter of ~9.3 mm (figure 2a).The previous lvis stent and loose coils are shown in figures 2b, c, respectively.The aneurysm was retreated using a ped of 4.0 mm × 20 mm (medtronic, minneapolis, minnesota) and three coils.A complete occlusion of the recanalized aneurysm was achieved (figure 2d).The ped covered only the proximal end of the lvis stent (figures 2e, f).A 6-month follow-up cta indicated complete occlusion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot number was not provided; therefore, a search for production-related ncrs could not be performed.The devices were implanted in the patients and not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Procedural or medical imaging was not provided.The alleged product issues/events as described could not be confirmed.This report is related to a different mfr report number for lvis devices from this article.Ling, yuhui, et al."retreatment with a pipeline embolization device for recanalized aneurysms following stent-assisted coiling embolization." frontiers in neurology 14 (2023).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H11: please note the original medwatch report was submitted incorrectly as section "b.1 report type" was selected as product problem (e.G.Defects/malfunctions).B1 was corrected by selecting only adverse event as the incident details indicated.Product problem (e.G.Defects/malfunctions) was not chosen in section b1 of this report.
 
Event Description
Please see h10 / h11.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LVIS D
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL COIL-ASSIST STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
MDR Report Key18253094
MDR Text Key329549414
Report Number2032493-2023-01086
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QCA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P170013
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/22/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/13/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/01/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/22/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/22/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-