Catalog Number CDS0706-XTW |
Device Problems
Retraction Problem (1536); Difficult to Open or Close (2921); Unintended Movement (3026); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/13/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient presented with grade 4+ functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with an aorta hugger for a mitraclip procedure.During device unpackaging of an xtw, the delivery catheter (dc) handle was rotated in the package as normal.The dc handle was straightened, and it continued to turn.Preparation was completed per instructions for use (ifu) and there were no further issues.As the clip delivery system (cds) was inserted and steered to the valve, additional curves were applied.Due to the aorta hugger, a half turn of m knob was applied.Additionally, a half turn of a knob and a quarter turn of + knob was applied during positioning.It was noted the physician applied a decent amount of torque to the dc handle and had to undo some rotation because it felt as it was spinning.When positioned above the valve, there was difficulty opening the clip.There were 3 attempts to troubleshoot.On the third attempt, after retracting the lock lever farther past the blue line, the clip opened.The leaflets were grasped.There was a lot of tension noted on the device.The clip could not close all the way down.There was tension noted during dc handle retraction.The clip was removed and replaced.The replacement xtw was implanted successfully.There was residual mr on anterior 3 and posterior 3 leaflets (a3/p3).An nt was selected to target the residual mr.The device was prepped with no issues.It was noted that the arm positioner was not at neutral during initial insertion into the steerable guide catheter (sgc).The physician noted that within the anatomy the system was tight.The arm positioner was turned to neutral.The clip needed additional height and a knob to go medial and pass the first clip.Once above the valve, the clip could not open.Troubleshooting was performed 4-5 times, and the clip could not open.The clip was removed without issues, and a replacement nt completed the procedure.The mr was reduced to grade 1+.There were no adverse patient effects or clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
All available information was investigated, and the reported difficult to close clip, difficult to open clip, arm positioner resistance, dc handle retraction issue, and unintended movement were not confirmed via returned device analysis.Additionally, a scratched dc handle was observed.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints reported from this lot.Based on available information and the returned device analysis, the cause of the reported difficult to close clip, difficult to open clip, arm positioner resistance, dc handle retraction issue, and unintended movement were unable to be determined.The observed scratched dc handle is likely a result of procedural circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.Na.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|