• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 07/21/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Meyer et al 2023- wallflex® and evolution® duodenal stents have similar efficacy but different safety for malignant gastric outlet obstruction we included 129 patients: 74 received wallflex r stent and 55 received evolution stent.Included patients were followed up by until december 31, 2020.Between may 1, 2018 and june 30,2020, all patients had evolution duodenal (cook medical, winston-salem, nc, usa) all procedures were performed using therapeutic gastroscopes or duodenoscopes.All patients were sedated by the intravenous administration of sedatives.Both stents are non-biodegradable metal stents made of nitinol with a body diameter of 22 mm, a flar diameter of 27 mm, and a length of 6, 9, or 12 cm depending on the length of the stricture.Contrast material was injected to determine the length of the obstruction and the length of the stent to be used.Both stents are already preloaded on a 10f delivery system, inserted, and deployed over a 0.035-inch guidewire.After the deployment of each stent, its patency was verified by injecting the contrast material into the oral side of the location where the stent was deployed.Event description: stent obstruction / malfunction - two other patients underwent repeat endoscopy due to obstruction and evolution stent malfunction, due to tumor progression: one had a locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and the other, a metastatic biliary adenocarcinoma.Repeat endoscopy 55 patients received an evolution stent.All consecutive patients older than 18 years of age, who underwent duodenal stent placements for malignant gastric outlet obstruction between (b)(6) 2013 and (b)(6), 2020, were included.Three patients were excluded because they were lost to follow-up after the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) # k163468 investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED
Type of Device
MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
sinead o'leary
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
MDR Report Key18265927
MDR Text Key329721275
Report Number3001845648-2023-00889
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date07/21/2023
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/06/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-