• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX23
Device Problem Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/10/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
As reported by our edwards affiliate in canada, it was an implant of a 23mm sapien 3 ultra transcatheter heart valve in aortic position by transfemoral approach.The 14fr esheath was inserted without issues, however, for valve insertion, it remained stuck in the non expandable portion of the esheath and it could not be advanced further.Multiple attempts were made without success.The commander delivery system kinked upon insertion of the valve inside the esheath.On fluoro, it was apparent that the valve was no longer in its originally crimped position on the catheter, therefore, it was decided to retract the devices and prep another valve.The esheath, commander system and crimped valve were removed as a single unit and discarded.A new esheath was prepped and inserted, followed by a new 23mm s3u valve which was deployed at the desired location.No harm for the patient.As per picture provided, a bent valve strut could be observed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The event reported is in the risk management documentation for transcatheter heart valve procedures.A previous investigation into this type of event is captured in an edwards lifesciences technical summary and applies to this complaint.Additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The device was returned for evaluation.Per visual evaluation of the device three valve struts were bent at the inflow side.Provided imagery also showed bent struts.Per the technical summary, the ifu, current risk mitigations include design and manufacturing controls, and training manuals have been reviewed, no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.In this case the valve frame damage was confirmed based on evaluation of the returned product evaluation and provided imagery.Available information suggests that procedural factors (excessive device manipulation, high push force) may have caused/contributed to the reported event.Excessive device manipulation or high push force can lead to the valve struts interacting with the sheath shaft and result in the strut damage at the valve inflow side.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no edwards product defects or labeling deficiencies were identified, no corrective or preventative action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key18268791
MDR Text Key329745731
Report Number2015691-2023-17937
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/26/2024
Device Model Number9750TFX23
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/10/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/05/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/12/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured01/26/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age77 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-