• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN FILTER
Device Problems Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem Abdominal Pain (1685)
Event Date 02/15/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was deployed for a patient with an unknown medical condition.Sometimes post the filter deployment, it was alleged that a filter strut was allegedly detached, and the detached strut perforated the inferior vena cava, located external to the inferior vena cava.Reportedly, the patient allegedly experienced abdominal pain, however the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the reported lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.The medical records included images.The image review was documented in the medical records.One image was reviewed.The xray image demonstrates an inferior vena cava filter adjacent to the lumbar spine.This is a plain film with no contrast so ability to assess tilt is limited.Furthermore, perforation is unable to be discerned.The struts all appear intact, and the filter appears to have no tilt.There does appear to be a strut that has perforated and migrated to the right of the vena cava.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Post filter deployment, an x-ray abdomen was performed for vaginal bleeding showed the filter was in place.Around fourteen years and ten months later, an x-ray lumbar spine was performed with history of spondylosis of lumbar region showed that the filter was noted to the right of l2.However, there is a thin linear metallic density measuring roughly 27 mm in length seen inferior lateral to the filter which may represent a fracture dislodged filter strut located external to the ivc.Around seven months and eighteen days later, mri abdomen, ct chest study was again reviewed and showed that the recovery filter was noted at l2-l3 location.There was no caudal or cephalad migration, no filter tilt and strut perforation was identified.There was a fractured or missing filter component noted at least 2 arms.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported perforation of inferior vena cava, and filter strut detachment.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was deployed for a patient with an unknown medical condition.Sometimes post the filter deployment, it was alleged that a filter strut was allegedly detached, and the detached strut perforated the inferior vena cava, located external to the inferior vena cava.Reportedly, the patient allegedly experienced abdominal pain, however the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VENA CAVA FILTER
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury 12804
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key18289305
MDR Text Key329993923
Report Number2020394-2023-01174
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
UNKNOWN
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/10/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN FILTER
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/16/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/08/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/10/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age59 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-