• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY RING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY RING Back to Search Results
Model Number 6200T
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Event Date 11/13/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned to edwards for evaluation as it remains implanted.Echo imaging was received and reviewed by third party echo imaging expert.Echo imaging impression: the submitted images are of poor quality and, without associated times of acquisition, are difficult to associate with specific surgical intervals.The images document ar after the first pump run, although the mechanism is not defined.The presence or absence of ar was not defined on the submitted pre-pump images, and an interval change cannot be confirmed.With very limited interrogation of the valve, it is unclear whether the appearance of aortic valve leaflet thickening and decreased leaflet motion during the post-pump #1 interval is real (albeit transient) or a function of imaging artifact.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient developed aortic regurgitation grade 3 during the surgery that was performed for mitral valvuloplasty with a mitral ring and tricuspid annuloplasty with a 28mm 6200t tricuspid ring.The surgery was performed in the order of mitral valvuloplasty (p3 triangular resection), pulmonary vein isolation, left atrial appendage closure, and tricuspid annuloplasty.After completing all procedures and releasing the aortic clamp, echo showed the aortic regurgitation.Because both ventricles had become swollen due to increased blood volume secondary to the regurgitation, the surgeon decided to perform an additional aortic valve replacement, so the aorta was re-clamped and a 19mm 11500aj aortic valve was implanted.The patient status was reported as recovered.Per the reported information, no sutures used to implant both rings were placed on the aortic side.According to the surgeon, mild ar was observed prior to the surgery, but no issues were confirmed in the aortic valve, such as leaflets thickening or immobility.The surgeon commented it was unknown regarding the causal relationship between this 6200t ring and the event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY RING
Type of Device
ANNULOPLASTY RING
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key18297099
MDR Text Key330113739
Report Number2015691-2023-18251
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K103520
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/08/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number6200T
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/14/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/08/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/23/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Hospitalization; Life Threatening;
-
-