Catalog Number 284002 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Leak/Splash (1354); Use of Device Problem (1670); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/29/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H4: the device manufacture date is currently unavailable.As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation.Therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.Udi: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the healthcare professional in france that during an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the fms vue pump device fell and hit the pinch valve.Water reflux at the level of the shaver when it was not used with the appearance of air bubbles in the pipe.And water was flowing onto the work field when the device was placed.With the suction variation, the shaver did not suction correctly at certain times.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H4: the device manufacture date was reported as unknown on the initial report; and has been updated accordingly.Investigation summary the complaint device was received at the service center and evaluated.During the service evaluation the following defects were identified: ¿ functional : inadequate flow per service reports, this complaint can be confirmed.The switch/relay were replaced to resolve the issues.After repair, the device was found to be working according to the specifications.As part of depuy mitek¿s quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The faulty parts was identified as the root cause for the device failure during the service evaluation.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Device history review manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|