• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. JRNY II BCS XLPE ART ISRT SZ 5-6 RT 10MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. JRNY II BCS XLPE ART ISRT SZ 5-6 RT 10MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 74027252
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem Discomfort (2330)
Event Date 11/20/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference: case (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that, after a tka surgery had been performed on (b)(6) 2020, the patient experienced a grinding sensation.This adverse event was treated by a revision surgery, on (b)(6)b 2023, in which a cement particle was found in between the femoral component and the poly, debridement, lateral release and a poly exchange was performed.Current health status of patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medical device problem code: updated.H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation stated that, according to the reported revision surgery findings, there were cement particles found between the femoral component and the poly, therefore a procedural variance cannot be ruled out.Since the patient¿s outcome is unknown, the impact to the patient beyond the reported grinding sensation, the subsequent revision, and the expected transient recovery period cannot be determined.Further impact can only be presumed but regularly scheduled follow-up/monitoring would be anticipated.Therefore, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed that prior to closure, the surgical site should be thoroughly cleaned of bone chips, extraneous cement, ectopic bone, etc.Foreign particles at the metal and/or plastic interface may cause excessive wear and/or friction.This has been identified as a warning and precaution.Based on the information provided, the patient discomfort was caused by the cement particles between the femoral component and the poly, therefore the unsatisfactory experience could be confirmed.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include surgical technique used or user/procedural variance.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation stated that, according to the reported revision surgery findings, there were cement particles found between the femoral component and the poly, therefore a procedural variance cannot be ruled out.Since the patient¿s outcome is unknown, the impact to the patient beyond the reported grinding sensation, the subsequent revision, and the expected transient recovery period cannot be determined.Further impact can only be presumed but regularly scheduled follow-up/monitoring would be anticipated.Therefore, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed that prior to closure, the surgical site should be thoroughly cleaned of bone chips, extraneous cement, ectopic bone, etc.Foreign particles at the metal and/or plastic interface may cause excessive wear and/or friction.This has been identified as a warning and precaution.Based on the information provided, the patient discomfort was caused by the cement particles between the femoral component and the poly, therefore the unsatisfactory experience could be confirmed.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include surgical technique used or user/procedural variance.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JRNY II BCS XLPE ART ISRT SZ 5-6 RT 10MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key18302475
MDR Text Key330180689
Report Number1020279-2023-02464
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier00885556179413
UDI-Public00885556179413
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K111711
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/29/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number74027252
Device Lot Number16KM13954
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/20/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/11/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/16/2024
01/25/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/17/2024
01/30/2024
Date Device Manufactured10/21/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization; Other;
-
-