It was reported that, after a tha had been performed on an unspecified date with a polarstem dual mobility system, the patient experienced osteolysis and aseptic loosening.A revision surgery was performed on or around 17-oct-2023 to explant the shell, liner and head.
|
H3, h6.It was reported that, after a total hip arthroplasty had been performed on an unspecified date with a polarcup dual mobility system, the patient experienced osteolysis and aseptic loosening.A revision surgery was performed on or around (b)(6) 2023 to explant the shell, liner and head.The device intended for use in treatment was not returned for investigation.A product evaluation was not possible.No batch number was communicated so the production history review was not possible.Due to insufficient information it is not possible to perform a review of past corrective actions.As the product and batch numbers are unknown, it is not possible to perform a complaint history review.Due to insufficient information it is not possible to determine a revision of the risk associated to the alleged device and event.Insufficient information was made available to determine the revision of the instructions for use applicable to the device at the time of manufacturing.However, a review of the current revision was conducted and it revealed that the instructions for use (lit.No.12.23, ed.03/21) states osteolysis and loosening of implant not related to bone-ingrowth as a ¿potential adverse device effect¿ in combination with the implantation of a hip prosthesis.No clinically sufficient data was provided to perform a medical investigation.The performed investigation does not lead to an accurately determined cause.Based on the available information it is not possible to investigate whether the reported device met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight and trauma to the joint replacement.There is no need for further actions because of the limited information provided.Nevertheless, smith + nephew will continue to monitor this device for similar issues.This complaint will be reopened should additional information or the device be received.
|