Product complaint # (b)(4).H6.Component code: g07002 - device not returned.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what is the total number of procedures where a seroma occurred with surgicel? there is 1 procedure.What is the procedure name? caesarian.What date did the seroma occur on? there was no seroma found.They re-operated on this patient for other reasons and found that the powder has remained as a mass in the patient.However, it is reported that the powder was covered in a layer of purastat.Was there any medical or surgical intervention performed (re-operation; re-closure; prescription medication)? reoperation occurred for reasons not related to this complaint.Can you identify the lot number of the product that was used? no.What is the most current patient status? recovered.The following information was requested, but unavailable: what is the procedure date? if medication was required, please clarify if it was prescribed or purchased over-the-counter? attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.1.Please provide the following patient demographic information, if available: age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure? 2.What were the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? 3.Please provide any relevant patient history: patient pre-existing medical conditions (i.E.Allergies, history of reactions), all concomitant medications, past medical history, any treatment required for events, dose, frequency, and therapy dates.4.Was there any intraoperative concurrent use of other products? 5.What is the lot number? 6.What was the intended use of the surgicel? was it used to address active bleeding or used prophylactically? 7.Where was the surgicel used (on what tissue)? 8.How much surgicel was used during the procedure? 9.Was the surgicel product left in place? was the excess irrigated and removed? 10.When was the mass first observed? 11.What was the reason for the patient¿s re-operation? 12.Please describe what type of surgical intervention was performed? 13.What is physician¿s opinion as to the cause of or contributing factors to this event? 14.What is the patient¿s current status? 15.What is the users experience w/ surgicel powder and other hemostatic agents? 16.Have any additional complaints been created to capture the patient events initially reported in the event description, where multiple surgeons have stopped using the product due to patient¿s experiencing seromas? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: after consulting with the hospital, we could only find one instance that related to surgical powder but was not a complaint about surgical powder.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|