• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V2
Device Problem Scratched Material (3020)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
E1- (b)(6) medical center.The device was returned and evaluated, and the customer¿s allegation was confirmed.Additional evaluation findings are as follows: due to a chip on the distal end, water tightness was lost; due to a pinhole on the bending section cover, water tightness was lost; due to the wear of the angle wire, the bending angle in the up direction did not meet the standard value; the control unit, switch box, scope cover, grip, angulation lever, insertion tube rotation ring, universal cord, video cable, light guide cover glass, light guide connector, video connector, video connector case all had a scratch.The investigation is ongoing.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation or when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the videoscope had leakage near the tip.There were no reports of patient harm.During the device evaluation, the following reportable malfunction was found: the forceps channel port was shaved.This medical device report (mdr) is being submitted to capture the reportable malfunction found during the evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to correct information that was provided in the initial medwatch report and to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.The device met all specifications at the time of shipment.It has been over 5 years since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the legal manufacturer's investigation, it is likely the event was caused by stress of repeated use, external factors, or handling of the device however, a conclusive root cause could not be determined.Instructions, operation manual for urf-v2 chapter 3 ¿preparation and inspection¿ section 3.3 ¿inspection of the endoscope¿ describes how to inspect for the subject event as below.¿inspection of the endoscope 1.Inspect the control section, video connector, and light guide connector for excessive scratching, deformation, loose parts, or other irregularities.¿ olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key18325228
MDR Text Key330487809
Report Number9610595-2023-19552
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170343582
UDI-Public04953170343582
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K172246
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/28/2023
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/01/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/14/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/20/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-