H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, videos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 01/2025) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one powerport isp mri implantable port kit with one powerport implantable port, one cath-lock loaded to a catheter, one introducer needle, one cath-lock, one 6.5fr peel-apart sheath and vessel dilator, one vein pick, one syringe, one straight-angle non-coring needle, one flushing connector, one j-tip guidewire loaded in a guidewire hoop, one tunneler and one sealed safety infusion set was returned for evaluation and two videos were provided for review.Functional, gross visual, tactile, dimensional and microscopic visual evaluations was performed.The vessel dilator was noted to be loaded to the peel-apart sheath but not locked into place on the t-handle.The distal tip of the peel-apart sheath was noted to be deformed and the edges of the distal end of the peel-apart sheath were noted to be jagged.Adhesive like material, was found under the dilator luer connector.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported sheath allegedly could not be tightened and was slipping on the teeth, and the identified deformation issues.Based on the measurements recorded during sample evaluation and applicable drawings, no measurements recorded could be confirmed to be out of tolerance.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.(expiration date: 01/2025), g3, h6 (device) (method, result, conclusion) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|