The customer reported arterial line interference during cautery.The issue was confirmed by a video provided by the customer during use.Additional information regarding on site systems, practices, and images was requested, but sufficient information was not provided.As not enough clinical information was provided - a root cause could not be determined.A draeger technician went onsite evaluated the device, and the error could not be reproduced.As by design, the filter esu settings only affect the ecg readings, and the arterial line may show interference when there are forceps attached to the patient.The customer was advised that interference could occur if esu or its cables are too close to the dual hemo transducer.Per clinical input, this is affected by the clinician's preference, how the or is set up, what kind of operation is taking place, where the cauterizing is occurring on the patient's body, etc.If either of the esu cables going to or from the patient are close to the transducer cable, it could cause interference.However, the customer did not provide any information regarding the esu location, or set up, clinical practice, etc, so the above statement cannot be confirmed or denied as the root cause.There are multiple warnings on keeping transducer cables away from esu cables in the instructions for use.(ifu) the customer was informed of the above information regarding esu and transducer locations during clinical use, and the customer did not respond to advise regarding the esu setting information or allege any reoccurrence of the malfunction.The draeger technician tested the mcable dual hemo with the iacs, and all devices passed manufacturers testing, and were returned to use.No further issues have been reported.H3 other text : see h10.
|