Model Number 20E |
Device Problem
Device Sensing Problem (2917)
|
Patient Problem
Asystole (4442)
|
Event Date 11/21/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
The customer contacted stryker to report that during a patient event their device was unable to detect the patient through the defibrillation electrodes.The customer advised that the device prompted them to ¿connect electrodes¿ when the defibrillation electrodes were connected to the patient.The customer advised they were using third party conmed padpro defibrillation electrodes.The patient did not survive.The customer reported that it was considered likely that the patient was found in asystole, or expired, but the paramedics were performing required measures upon their delivery of the patient to the facility.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The customer provided stryker with all the available patient information.Patient fields in which information was not provided were intentionally left blank.Stryker performed a clinical review of the reported issue and determined that the device use did not contribute to the patient outcome due to the following: the healthcare provider reported that the patient was in asystole or expired before the resuscitation began.In the medical judgment of these reviewers, the device did not cause or contribute to the reported outcome.Stryker continues to investigate the reported issue and will submit a supplemental report on this event to the fda as provided by 21 cfr 803.56.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Stryker evaluated the customer's device and was able to verify the reported issue through the electronic records of device.However, the reported issue could not be duplicated.After observing proper device operation through functional and performance testing, the device was returned to the customer for use.The cause of the reported issue could not be determined.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer contacted stryker to report that during a patient event their device was unable to detect the patient through the defibrillation electrodes.The customer advised that the device prompted them to ¿connect electrodes¿ when the defibrillation electrodes were connected to the patient.The customer advised they were using third party conmed padpro defibrillation electrodes.The patient did not survive.The customer reported that it was considered likely that the patient was found in asystole, or expired, but the paramedics were performing required measures upon their delivery of the patient to the facility.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|