E1 - initial reporter address 1: (b)(6).Device evaluated by mfr: the complaint device was received for product analysis.The main coil, the introducer sheath and the pusher wire were returned for the analysis.It was necessary to make cuts in the introducer to free the coil.It was observed that the main coil was bent, stretched and detached.No more damages were observed during visual examination.The functional examination could not be performed due the main coil and the pusher wire are not interlocking.Dimensional inspection of the main coil revealed the components were within specifications.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 07dec2023.It was reported that resistance was felt when advancing the coil in the catheter.A 4mm x 15cm interlock coil was selected for right leg arteriovenous malformation procedure.During the procedure, the physician used a non-boston scientific microcatheter to reach the lesion.However, when this coil was advanced, the coil could no longer be pushed after about releasing about 2/3 due to obvious resistance.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No complications were reported, and the patient was stable post procedure.However, device analysis revealed that the main coil was detached.
|