It was reported that, after a total hip revision surgery had been conducted on (b)(6) 2023 to exchange the stem and head, the patient experienced two dislocations.This incident was addressed via revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023 by exchanging the ceramic ball head delta 28 m for a merete plug-in system.The patient current health status is unknown.
|
It was reported that, after a total hip revision surgery had been conducted on (b)(6) 2023 to exchange the stem and head, the patient experienced two dislocations.This incident was addressed via revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023 by exchanging the ceramic ball head delta 28 m for a merete plug-in system.The sn stem and cup and the non-sn liner were retained.The patient current health status is unknown.
|
Additional information: h6 (component code, type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusions).Results of investigation: it was reported that, after a total hip revision surgery had been conducted on (b)(6) 2023 to exchange the stem and head, the patient experienced two dislocations.This incident was addressed via revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023 by exchanging the ceramic ball head delta 28 m for a merete plug-in system.The stem, cup and liner were retained.The device intended for use in treatment was not returned for investigation.A product evaluation was not possible.A review of the production documentation did not detect any deviation that could have contributed to the reported failure mode.There is no evidence that the reported devices failed to meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The complaint history review for the complaint device revealed no additional complaints for the affected batch nor additional complaints for the same product number over the past 12 months with similar failure mode.A review of past corrective actions was performed.No further escalation is required.A review of the risk management documentation verifies the failure mode, occurrence and severity of the reported issue.The instructions for use (lit.No.12.23, ed.03/21) states "joint dislocation" as a ¿potential adverse device effect¿ in combination with the implantation of a hip prosthesis.Based on the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported dislocations could not be confirmed.However, the use of cemented non-s+n insert, the recent change of the hip stem and recent hip revision are likely contributory factors.The patient impact includes the dislocations and subsequent revision surgery and associated recovery period.It is unknown the future impact of having the mixed components of different manufacturers.The performed investigation does not lead to an accurately determined cause.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight and trauma to the joint replacement.There is no need for further actions.Nevertheless, smith + nephew will continue to monitor this device for similar issues.This complaint will be reopened should additional information or the device be received.Corrected data: b5 (narrative updated).
|