• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY POLY SZ 2+ 8MM TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY POLY SZ 2+ 8MM TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33653208
Device Problem Failure to Osseointegrate (1863)
Patient Problems Rheumatoid Arthritis (1724); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 11/22/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient required a revision surgery due to tibial tray loosening 6 weeks post-op.The patient was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis after the initial surgery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis results are not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when the analysis is complete.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient required a revision surgery due to tibial tray loosening 6 weeks post-op.The patient was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis after the initial surgery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could be confirmed since the device was explanted and returned for evaluation.The device inspection revealed the following: the poly was returned connected to the tibial tray and could not be detached.Scratches and deformation most likely resulting from explantation of the device are visible on the poly.Key dimensional measurements were taken with a digital caliper and found to be within dimensional specifications.Upon further investigation of the received information by healthcare professionals the following was observed: ¿from the additional information given in this case (failure six weeks after the implantation but no confirmed infection) it can be assumed, that the poor bone stock and additional patient related problems (ra) have contributed to the failure.A different implant would have been chosen by the surgeon-at least that is stated- to prevent the implant from early loosening.¿ r&d reviewed microscopic images of the poly and noted the following: "there appears to be embedded debris on the surface of the uhmwpe insert articular surface.The debris appears to range from 1mm to 3mm in maximum dimension.Debris seems to be denser on the anterior and posterior ends of the articular surface.There is no apparent difference in distribution between the medial and lateral condyles (this is by gross observation, not formal statistical analysis).The electron dispersive spectroscopy (eds) indicated that these particulates are a titanium-based alloy.There is no indication of when these particulates were embedded into the articular surface.There appear to be many scratches along the anterior-posterior axis on both condyles.There are also many damage marks that are pit-like, although it does not appear to be "pitting" which is a distinct wear phenomenon.On the posterior side of the insert, there appear to be damage marks from drilling and gouge marks on the posterior end of the inferior side.These marks are both consistent with damage associated with removal of an implant (drilling tool and rongeur, respectively).Unfortunately, it is not possible for us to distinguish wear scars (obtained from articulation and use of the implant) from damage induced during the removal of the insert from the patient.Additionally, our eds is not validated for positive material identification and is used for our reference." based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a patient related issue.The failure was most likely caused by poor bone stock and the rheumatoid arthritis experienced by the patient.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.¿¿ a review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.¿ no indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.¿ ¿ if more information is provided, the case will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFINITY POLY SZ 2+ 8MM TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key18342205
MDR Text Key330658453
Report Number3010667733-2023-00783
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00840420122674
UDI-Public00840420122674
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K140749
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/01/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number33653208
Device Lot Number1663318
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/23/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/17/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/06/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/01/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/12/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-