Model Number FX414T |
Device Problems
Mechanical Problem (1384); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
|
Patient Problem
Hydrocephalus (3272)
|
Event Date 11/24/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a progav (#f----t) was implanted during a procedure performed on unknown according to the complainant, the shunt showed adjustment difficulties.The patient underwent a revision procedure performed on unknown.The complainant device has not yet returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing site evaluation: no product received to date.Should relevant additional information/investigation results become available, an additional medwatch report will be submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Due to the missing product information (e.G.Serial number/delivery note batch), we were unable to trace the production of affected product.We can assure you that all our products are manufactured by qualified staff and individually tested before they are placed on the market.An investigation or traceability was not possible because the product is not available.Regarding similar complaints where we could examine the products, we could determine that the most frequent cause for a deterioration in the function of the product are deposits caused by natural substances in the cerebrospinal fluid, e.G.Protein, blood or tissue particles.These are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.Even small amounts of organic material can affect the integrity of the valve if aggregated in the valve.A final clarification and conclusion of the cause what has led to "adjustment difficulties" is only possible by an examination.
|
|
Event Description
|
No further information about article or incident available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Visual inspection: during the investigation, no significant deformations or damage of the valve were determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of over-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the progav 2.0 operates within the accepted tolerance in the horizontal position.The shunt assistant does not operate within the specified tolerances in the vertical position.An accelerated outflow of shunt assistant could be determined.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is not adjustable.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function operates as expected; however, the breaking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.To make the deposits in the shunt system more visible, they were colored using a staining solution.Results: based on the results of our investigation, we can determine that the progav 2.0 is not adjustable and that the shunt assistant has an accelerated outflow.The visible deposits found on the inside could have impaired the function of the valves.Deposits caused by substances naturally present in the patient's body, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.Even small amounts of organic material can affect the integrity of the valve.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shunt system (#fx414t) was implanted during a procedure performed on unknown date.According to the complainant, the shunt system showed an over-drainage and adjustment difficulties.The patient underwent a revision procedure performed on (b)(6) 2023.The complainant device has returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 22 years.Gender: female.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|