Correction to h6; type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusion.The 29mm commander delivery system (ds) was not available for examination.Due to the unavailability of the complaint device, engineering could not perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.The following instructions for use (ifu) were reviewed: the commander delivery system and the device procedural training manual.Based on this review, no ifu training deficiencies were identified.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint of balloon burst was unable to be confirmed as no procedural imagery or device was provided for evaluation.Due to the unavailability of the device, engineering was unable to perform any visual, functional, or dimensional analysis; therefore, a manufacturing non-conformance was unable to be determined.Due to the unavailability of the device lot number, a review of the dhr and lot history was unable to be performed.A review of the ifu and training manuals revealed no deficiencies.The reported event states, "during an off-label tavr case for pure ai using a 29mm sapien 3 valve via subclavian approach, +7cc to start and the valve began to migrate into the left ventricle shortly after.Several cc's were added after to secure the valve more and the balloon burst".While the balloons are sufficiently designed and tested to ensure the burst pressure is at or above the rated burst pressure, there are several factors that could result in balloon burst such as calcification, over-inflation, and interaction with previously implanted valve/stent.In this case, additional volume (+7cc) was initially added, and then several cc's were used to secure the valve.The prescribed nominal inflation volume is provided in the ifu.Based on the provided information, it is possible that the balloon was overinflated, subjecting the balloon to pressures high enough to cause the balloon to burst.While a conclusive root cause was unknown, available information suggests that procedural factors (over-inflation) may have contributed to the balloon burst.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.As such, neither a product risk assessment nor corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.
|