|
Catalog Number LXMC13 |
Device Problems
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Pyrosis/Heartburn (1883)
|
Event Date 01/01/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there is a discontinuous linx device.Date of new symptom onset (if any): in 2021, patient experienced recurrence of reflux symptoms that prompted an xray showing discontinuous device.Any imaging post implant but pre-discovery of discontinuity: not in our medical records any mris since implant: n/a any trauma to the area post implant: n/a general health: healthy female, underweight allergies: wheat bmi: 18.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 12/19/2023 b3: only event year known: 2023 lot number was received and dhr is pending review.When the review is completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent with a summary of the evaluation.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: productcompliant1@its.Jnj.Com was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? when and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? when and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 1/18/2024.Additional information received; spoke with patient who indicated her device will be explanted this (b)(6).It was implanted on (b)(6) 2017.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? yes.Were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? unknown.Did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? no.Did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? unknown.Was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.No imaging.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? removed today, no replacement device needed.When and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? not available.When and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis? yes, shipper kit provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent; 1/30/2024.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4) investigation summary: a linx device with a visible weld ball that disconnected from a washer was returned to the analysis site.The link length and tensile force measurements were found to meet the applicable specifications during device analysis.The remaining device characteristics, excepting the visible weld ball, show no anomalies for a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure, significant tooling marks were noted in some beads.The device was scanned using computer tomography (ct), optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy.The washer through-hole at the separation was measured and was greater than the specification.The washer through-hole was concentric with material displacement at the outer edge of the through hole.The overall appearance of the surface of the washer through hole didn¿t exhibit gross loss of shape.The top view of the diameter of the exposed weld ball was measured.This diameter is within the specification.The weld ball was concentric with the respect to the wire.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device (b)(4) number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|