BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INTERLOCK-35; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 83787 |
Device Problem
Failure to Advance (2524)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/26/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 08dec2023.It was reported that the device could not be pushed at the back end of the catheter.The target lesion was located in the iliac artery.A 10mm x 40cm interlock-35 was selected for use.During the procedure, the device was continuously hydrated before introduction of the coil.The physician used cordis.5f catheter to deploy five bsc coils; two 10x40, and three 8x40 respectively.However, when the first 10x40 was deploy, it could not advance at the middle of the catheter and could not be pushed at the back end of the catheter event after several attempts were made.The device was removed along with the catheter.The procedure was completed with another of same device.No complications were reported, and patient was stable post procedure.However, device analysis revealed that the main coil was detached at the coil arm section.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
E1: initial reporter facility name: (b)(6).Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.Visual inspection observed that the main coil was kinked, detached and stretched at the coil arm section.No more damages were observed.The functional could not be performed due the main coil and the pusher wire are not interlocking.Dimensional inspection on the main coil revealed that the zap tip od (outer diameter) and the primary coil od was within specification.
|
|
Event Description
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 08dec2023.It was reported that the device could not be pushed at the back end of the catheter.The target lesion was located in the iliac artery.A 10mm x 40cm interlock-35 was selected for use.During the procedure, the device was continuously hydrated before introduction of the coil.The physician used cordis.5f catheter to deploy five bsc coils; two 10x40, and three 8x40 respectively.However, when the first 10x40 was deploy, it could not advance at the middle of the catheter and could not be pushed at the back end of the catheter event after several attempts were made.The device was removed along with the catheter.The procedure was completed with another of same device.No complications were reported, and patient was stable post procedure.However, device analysis revealed that the main coil was detached at the coil arm section.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H6 evaluation conclusion code: corrected e1: initial reporter facility name - (b)(6) h10: additional mfr narrative corrected: device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.Visual inspection observed that the main coil was kinked, detached and stretched at the coil arm section.No more damages were observed.The functional could not be performed due the main coil and the pusher wire are not interlocking.Dimensional inspection on the main coil revealed that the zap tip od (outer diameter) and the primary coil od was within specification.The reported complaint event main coil unable to advance in catheter is not confirmed since the customer used (cordis5f) and the use of other diagnostic catheters may result in an inability to deliver, deploy, or recapture the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|