It was reported that on (b)(6) 2023, a 27mm navitor valve was chosen for implant, using a large flexnav delivery system.During deployment of the valve, the patient¿s blood pressure was observed to drop.Subsequently, the system was removed from the anatomy.Reinsertion was attempted after flushing the blood from all flush ports as much as possible, but it was difficult to insert due to a split of the tip of the valve capsule.The patient had a mild tortuous anatomy.As adhesion of the thrombus was recognized when the bioprosthetic valve was removed, the system was changed including valve and delivery system.During advancement of flexnav, the physician attempted to deliver the device while pushing the non-abbott guidewire excessively.A strong resistance was felt when passing through the aortic arch.It was suspected that the apex was perforated at that time.Pericardial effusion was observed, requiring pericardiocentesis.This has led to cardiac tamponade.This was attributed to the guidewire.After the pericardial drainage was performed, the chest was opened, then arrest hemorrhage.Shifted to surgical aortic valve replacement (avr).The patient is reported to be still on percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (pcps) as of (b)(6) 2023.This has reportedly caused a clinically significant delay.
|
An event of difficult insertion and material deformation was reported.Information from the field indicated that reinsertion was difficult due to a flared valve capsule tip.Based on available information, the reported difficult insertion appears to be related to the flared valve capsule tip.However, a root cause for the flared valve capsule tip could not be conclusively determined.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|