Catalog Number 42512600712 |
Device Problems
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Pain (1994); Ambulation Difficulties (2544); Osteopenia/ Osteoporosis (2651); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
Event Date 08/10/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an initial left total knee arthroplasty.Subsequently, two weeks post-implantation, the patient began to experience progressive pain and swelling of the left knee.Diagnostic images revealed a bone fracture of the distal femur.The patient underwent intervention to correct the fracture and the articular surface was found to be dislocated secondary to the fracture.The bearing was replaced without reported complication.Due diligence is in progress for this event, to date no further information has been reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).D10: medical product: femur cemented posterior stabilized (ps) standard left size 7: catalog#42500606201, lot#65751325; tibia cemented 5 degree stemmed left size e: catalog#42532007101, lot#65967550; stem extension tapered cemented 14 mm diameter +30 mm length: catalog#42557000114, lot#65890790; all poly patella cemented 29 mm diameter: catalog#42540000029, lot#65800883; refobacin plus bone cem 2x40-3: catalog#3021170001-3, lot#ax30ce2303, qty#2; refobacin plus bone cem 2x20-3: catalog#3021180001-3, lot#x02aai0105 g2: foreign: germany.Multiple mdr reports have been filed for this event.Please see associated report: 3007963827-2023-00327.Diligence is in process to determine whether the product is available for evaluation.The investigation is in progress.Upon receipt of additional information or completion of the investigation, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.Upon receipt of additional information, this device was determined to be not reportable.The previously reported dislocation was referring to the fractured bone fragments and not the articular surface.As the periprosthetic fracture was of the medial femoral condyle, only the implanted femoral component has been implicated in the reported event.The initial report for this device was forwarded in error.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Event Description
|
Upon receipt of additional information, this device was determined to be not reportable.The previously reported dislocation was referring to the fractured bone fragments and not the articular surface.As the periprosthetic fracture was of the medial femoral condyle, only the implanted femoral component has been implicated in the reported event.The initial report for this device was forwarded in error.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|