EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES RETROGRADE CARDIOPLEGIA CATHETER; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number RC2012 |
Device Problem
Material Rupture (1546)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/26/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the balloon of rc2012 retro cannula got ruptured during use.The pressure did not rise therefore the cannula was removed from the patient and the balloon rupture was noticed.The cannula was replaced with a new rc2012.There is no patient adverse event reported.The patient status was reported as recovered.The device was stored flat at the hospital.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned to edwards for evaluation.H3.Device evaluation: customer complaint of balloon rupture was confirmed.Balloon failed inflation test due to a balloon rupture.As received, edges of rupture site were unable to match up.What appeared to be dark burn marks were observed along the edges of the rupture site.All through lumens were found to be patent without any leakage or occlusion.No other visual damage, contamination, or other abnormalities were found to the device.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Added information to h6.The complaint is able to be confirmed via returned product evaluation.There is no evidence to suggest an edwards manufacturing defect.A device history record (dhr) review was performed, and no relevant non-conformances were identified.Per supplier nvestigation- a review of the finished good dhr indicates that all validated processes and parameters were followed during the manufacturing of this device lot.This includes a 100% leak and flow test, which would not have allowed this defect to pass.No non-conformances or deviations were associated with this lot.A review of the balloon component dhrs indicates that all validated processes and parameters were followed during the manufacturing of this component lot.This includes a 100% double wall thickness check and 100% visual inspection for defects, including aneurysms or pregnancies.This defect would not have been allowed to pass through these checks.No non-conformances or deviations were associated with these lots.Based on the information received, the complaint cannot be confirmed to be related to manufacturing issues.Markings consistent with burns were observed along the edges of the rupture site.Based on the information available the most likely root cause of the reported event is that it occurred during customer use or handling.It is likely that the balloon came into contact with a heated device or electrical instrument resulting in observed damage.No manufacturing deficiencies that could have contributed to this event have been identified.If this damage was present prior to use it would have been identified during balloon preparation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|