The user facility report states that the device is back in use after having been repaired by the manufacturer.In fact, the device is not under a draeger service contract and, the hospital did not involve the local dräger s&s organization into any follow-up measures.A potential explanation would be that a third-party service provider did the examination and repair.This does not allow a case-specific evaluation by dräger and, no reliable conclusion in regard to the exact root cause can be made.The device was manufactured in 2012 and, the state of preventive maintenance is not known.The ifu clearly describes that preventive maintenance and calibration shall be done in annual intervals.It cannot be excluded for the particular case that calibration was overdue already and that this has lead to measurement inaccuracy.Other explanations may apply as well; a differentiation is not possible due to lack of information.H3 other text : device not available for evaluation.
|