Philips received a complaint on the intellivue mx400 patient monitor indicating that the monitor did not alarm for bradycardia for a stimulated patient on (b)(6) 2023, at 6:30 p.M.The device was in use on a patient, and there was a report of death of the patient.A good faith effort (gfe) was performed to clarify additional details regarding the patient incident, but no further clarifying information was provided.The remote service engineer (rse) spoke with the customer and found that the ¿stimulated patient¿ checkmark was selected upon admission to the monitor or to the central unit.To the tester, the bradycardia tolerance was 90, and the pacemaker was 75, but the device did not alarm at all.The nurses said that alarms never sound in bradycardia and only 15 minutes after cardiac arrest the asystole alarm sounds.The complaint was escalated for technical investigation and the results indicate that there is insufficient information available, and the provided logs cannot be reviewed as the bed information is contradictory between the logs that were received and what was stated in the complaint.Based on the information available and the testing conducted, the cause of the reported problem is unknown.The reported problem was not confirmed.It is unknown how this issue was resolved.The customer did not provide any additional details; therefore, the cause cannot be determined at this time.It was indicated that the customer requested assistance in configuring the alarms of the central station, particularly in stimulated mode, but the customer advised that they would open a new case.It has been concluded that no further action is required at this time.If additional information is received the complaint file will be reopened.H3 other text : device / logs not made available by customer.
|