(b)(4) date sent: 1/2/2024 maude report: mw5147926.Photo images were received.Any additional information obtained from the photo evaluation will be included as part of the product investigation.An analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.However, if the product is received at a later date, the investigation will be updated as applicable.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 11448 number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.Lot 11448 was an affected lot of the 2018 linx recall.Additional information attached: patient was hypertensive and taken to urgent care for observation and later released after getting back to baseline.The surgeon's office that the implemented the device was contacted immediately to coordinate urgent follow - up.The concerned was that the linx device had migrated when the patient was moved into the mri machine.The patient was seen and expressed no new symptoms and that the pain was felt during the mri was resolved.Out of precaution, an esophagram was still ordered to verify device placement.The esophagram was completed on (b) (6) 2023 and reveled a new gap between 2 components of the device, suspected of device failure high blood pressure/hypertension additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: please clarify what is meant by ¿large gap¿? is the device broken? is the wire broken? is the device discontinuous? are there any photos of the device that you could send to product complaint1@its.Jnj.Com answer: thank you for reaching out about this complaint.Regarding your questions, i¿m afraid i may only be of limited help.What i mentioned in the report was based off of the esophagram that this patient completed on (b)(6) 2023: ¿linx device appears unchanged in position from 2018, though there is a larger gap between 2 of the components and overall circumference appears increased.¿ from the report¿s impressions: ¿linx device is unchanged in position, but there now a larger gap between 2 of the metallic components and increased circumference of the ring, suspected device failure.¿ the images were not obtained within corewell health, but i have requested the images from the study to be sent over to us for our radiologists to review in hopes to provide better clarity for you.The patient completed an mri cervical spine study on (b)(6) 2023.It was performed on a siemens 1.5t machine.The patient expressed acute abdominal pain to the mri technologist, was hypertensive after the mri, and required temporary admission to a local urgent care for observation until symptoms resolved.Patient identification is available upon request if necessary.Was this a 1.5 t device? yes it was.It was confirmed with the patient¿s blue implant card that she brought to her mri appointment what part of the body was being imaged? it was an mri cervical spine what was the field strength of the mri? 1.5 tesla (siemens aera fit 1.5t) this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|