• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT OPTIFLUX 180NRE DIALYZER FINISHED ASSY.; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT OPTIFLUX 180NRE DIALYZER FINISHED ASSY.; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0500318E
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problems Chest Pain (1776); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 12/13/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: the plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity.Clinical investigation: a temporal relationship exists between hd therapy utilizing an optiflux 180nre dialyzer, and the serious adverse events of blood loss (approximately 400 ml) and chest pain, which required hospitalization, as the patient was actively undergoing treatment when the serious adverse events occurred.Per the hdrn, the patient¿s blood (darkened) was visualized inside the optiflux 180nre dialyzer (extending into the extracorporeal circuit), and a blood leak test strip was utilized to confirm its presence (no visible damage was noted on the interior/exterior of the dialyzer pretreatment).While uncommon, blood leak events are a known potential complication of utilizing optiflux series dialyzers during hd therapy.Based on the totality of the information available, the optiflux 180nre dialyzer cannot be excluded from having a causal role in the patient¿s serious adverse events (e.G., blood loss, chest pain, hospitalization).Given the hdrn¿s testimony/observations regarding the optiflux 180nre dialyzer¿s performance, and the pending manufacturer evaluation of the suspect product, this clinical investigation cannot disassociate the optiflux 180nre dialyzer from the serious adverse events.
 
Event Description
A user facility registered nurse (rn) reported a hemodialysis (hd) patient was on treatment for about one hour and a half when a blood leak alarmed.The rn stated blood appeared black in extracorporeal system.The rn tested the dialysate which tested positive for a blood leak.The patient's doctor informed to run the patient again with a new setup and machine.The rn stated thirty minutes into that treatment, a blood leak happened again.Upon follow-up, the rn stated the blood leaks were internal and occurred an hour and a half after initiation of the first treatment and thirty minutes after initiation of the second treatment.The machine, a 2008t, alarmed appropriately with blood leak alerts during both instances.The rn stated very dark, nearly black blood was visually observed within the dialyzers and in the in extracorporeal system during both instances.Blood test strips were used and tested positive for the presence of blood.The patient was utilizing fresenius bloodlines.No damage was noted on the dialyzers prior to treatment.The estimated blood loss was 200 ml during both instances.Immediately following the first blood leak event, the patient was re-setup with new supplies on a different machine before the second blood leak occurred.The rn stated after cancelling the second treatment the patient complained of chest pain and was taken to the emergency room on (b)(6) 2023, where the patient currently remains hospitalized.Both machines were removed from service.The dialyzers were available to be returned for manufacturer evaluation.
 
Event Description
A user facility registered nurse (rn) reported a hemodialysis (hd) patient was on treatment for about one hour and a half when a blood leak alarmed.The rn stated blood appeared black in extracorporeal system.The rn tested the dialysate which tested positive for a blood leak.The patient's doctor informed to run the patient again with a new setup and machine.The rn stated thirty minutes into that treatment, a blood leak happened again.Upon follow-up, the rn stated the blood leaks were internal and occurred an hour and a half after initiation of the first treatment and thirty minutes after initiation of the second treatment.The machine, a 2008t, alarmed appropriately with blood leak alerts during both instances.The rn stated very dark, nearly black blood was visually observed within the dialyzers and in the in extracorporeal system during both instances.Blood test strips were used and tested positive for the presence of blood.The patient was utilizing fresenius bloodlines.No damage was noted on the dialyzers prior to treatment.The estimated blood loss was 200 ml during both instances.Immediately following the first blood leak event, the patient was re-setup with new supplies on a different machine before the second blood leak occurred.The rn stated after cancelling the second treatment the patient complained of chest pain and was taken to the emergency room on (b)(6) 2023, where the patient currently remains hospitalized.Both machines were removed from service.The dialyzers were available to be returned for manufacturer evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: the reported complaint was not confirmed as the complaint device was not returned for manufacturer evaluation.During the lot history review it was noted that there was one other complaint reported against the lot.The complaint is mentioned above and addresses an internal blood leak.The number of complaints for the assigned symptom code on the lot number was reviewed and it was determined that no lot complaint excursion occurred.A production records review was performed on the reported lot.An investigation of the device history records (dhr) was conducted by the manufacturer.There were two approved temporary deviation notices (dn) reported on the lot which were unrelated to the complaint event.There was no indication of product nonacceptance, deviation, non-conformance, rework, labeling or process control failure during the manufacturing process which could be associated with the reported event.The lot met all release criteria.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without physical examination of the actual device.Therefore, the complaint is not confirmed.
 
Event Description
A user facility registered nurse (rn) reported a hemodialysis (hd) patient was on treatment for about one hour and a half when a blood leak alarmed.The rn stated blood appeared black in extracorporeal system.The rn tested the dialysate which tested positive for a blood leak.The patient's doctor informed to run the patient again with a new setup and machine.The rn stated thirty minutes into that treatment, a blood leak happened again.Upon follow-up, the rn stated the blood leaks were internal and occurred an hour and a half after initiation of the first treatment and thirty minutes after initiation of the second treatment.The machine, a 2008t, alarmed appropriately with blood leak alerts during both instances.The rn stated very dark, nearly black blood was visually observed within the dialyzers and in the in extracorporeal system during both instances.Blood test strips were used and tested positive for the presence of blood.The patient was utilizing fresenius bloodlines.No damage was noted on the dialyzers prior to treatment.The estimated blood loss was 200 ml during both instances.Immediately following the first blood leak event, the patient was re-setup with new supplies on a different machine before the second blood leak occurred.The rn stated after cancelling the second treatment the patient complained of chest pain and was taken to the emergency room on (b)(6) 2023, where the patient currently remains hospitalized.Both machines were removed from service.The dialyzers were available to be returned for manufacturer evaluation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OPTIFLUX 180NRE DIALYZER FINISHED ASSY.
Type of Device
DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT
director, site quality
475 west 13th street
ogden UT 84404
Manufacturer (Section G)
OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT
director, site quality
475 west 13th street
ogden UT 84404
Manufacturer Contact
jessica trujillo
920 winter st
waltham, MA 02451
6174175172
MDR Report Key18427565
MDR Text Key331866321
Report Number0001713747-2024-00003
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDI
UDI-Device Identifier00840861100156
UDI-Public00840861100156
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K162488
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number0500318E
Device Lot Number23LU02001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device AgeMO
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/15/2023
Initial Date FDA Received01/02/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/06/2024
03/08/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/06/2024
03/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/03/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FRESENIUS BLOODLINES; FRESENIUS BLOODLINES; FRESENIUS BLOODLINES; FRESENIUS HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE; FRESENIUS HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE; FRESENIUS HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age73 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight71 KG
-
-