• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES GMBH THORACIC PEDICLE PROBE; SCREWDRIVER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES GMBH THORACIC PEDICLE PROBE; SCREWDRIVER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03.622.005
Device Problems Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/11/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2023 a thoracic pedicle probe broke intra-operatively and the fragment remained in the patient's sacrum.The surgeon would like to know the exact metal composite of the probe and the mri compatibility.There was a fifteen (15) minutes of surgical delay.The procedure was successfully completed with a patient outcome reported as stable.This report is for one (1) thoracic pedicle probe.This is report 1 of 1 for complaint (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: d9: complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.H3, h6: the investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H6: photo investigation: the photo was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned photo.Visual analysis of the photo revealed that the tip pf the thoracic pedicle probe was observed broken at the tip, and embedded device condition can be confirmed due to the fragment can be observed in the provided patient x-ray.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed for thoracic pedicle probe.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.H6: device history record (dhr) review conducted: part # 03.622.005.Synthes lot # 6529479.Supplier lot # 6529479.Release to warehouse date: 12 jan 2012.Supplier : (b)(4).No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THORACIC PEDICLE PROBE
Type of Device
SCREWDRIVER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES TUTTLINGEN
unter hasslen 5
tuttlingen 78532
GM   78532
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
8472871282
MDR Report Key18439929
MDR Text Key331870220
Report Number8030965-2024-00172
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HXX
UDI-Device Identifier10705034718187
UDI-Public(01)10705034718187
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number03.622.005
Device Lot Number6529479
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/12/2023
Initial Date FDA Received01/03/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/15/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/26/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/12/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age68 YR
-
-