Catalog Number 778626 |
Device Problem
Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/20/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was a crack at the rolled-up front end of the ureteral stent.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was a crack at the rolled-up front end of the ureteral stent.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported event is confirmed cause unknown.Visual evaluation noted the sample was provided with the original bard inlay pouch placed inside a large ziploc bag.When evaluating the sample, it could be seen that it had been removed form all packaging including the perforated bag.The separation occurred at the suture porthole to the end of the stent.This is seen when the suture is puled from the stent.The suture was provided does appear to be pulled due to the stretching and form of the material.Dimensional evaluation noted dimensional requirements per cd-7068-xx state the od to be 0.079" ± 0.02", tip id to be 0.043" ± 0.002", and the guidewire to be 0.038" ± 0.001".The od was measured at 0.0784" using a laser micrometer.The id was measured using a 0.043" pin gauge.A 0.038" guidewire passed through the sample with no hesitation.The root cause could not be identified.Although a root cause could not be definitively identified, based on the risk documentation review, a potential root cause for this type of failure could be material selection.However, there was insufficient information to confirm this potential root cause.The dhr review did not show any problems or conditions that would have contributed to the reported event.The instructions for use were found adequate and states the following: "improper handling technique can seriously weaken the stent." "exercise care.Tearing of the stent can be caused by sharp instruments." "care should be exercised when removing the stent from inner polybag so as not to cause tearing or fragmentation." "the insertion of a ureteral stent should only be done by those individuals who have comprehensive training in the techniques and risks of the procedure." h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the actual/suspected device was inspected.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was a crack at the rolled-up front end of the ureteral stent.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|