It was reported that, after tka surgery had been performed 12 years ago, on an unknown date, the patient experienced knee pain.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2023 to address this adverse event, changing the patella component.Current health status of patient is unknown.
|
The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that according to the report, the patient was revised 12 years post total knee arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2023, due to pain.It was reported the surgeon changed the patella component.Consequently, as of the date of this medical investigation, no new documentation has been provided; therefore, no clinical factors can be concluded to have definitively contributed to the patient¿s reported pain.The impact to the patient beyond the reported pain and subsequent revision cannot be confirmed nor concluded since the current health status of the patient is unknown.Device specific identifiers were not provided.Therefore, an evaluation of the manufacturing records, complaint history review, risk management file and prior actions could not be performed.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed in warnings and precautions that periodic, long-term follow-up is recommended to monitor the position and state of the prosthetic components, as well as the condition of the adjoining bone.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include traumatic injury, joint tightness, and/or patient condition.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|