Catalog Number 1003331 |
Device Problems
Leak/Splash (1354); Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/14/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.The additional copilot devices referenced in b5 are filed under separate medwatch report numbers.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in an unspecified artery.The indeflator was attempted to be used, however, a failure with the device valve was reported resulting in blood leakage.Three other indeflators from the same lot had the same issue of blood leakage.Another indeflator with a different lot was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported adverse patient effect and there was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.It is possible that the devices were not properly aligned and/or not fully connected/tightened while attempting to connect and/or the port of the device being connected was compromised resulting in the reported loose/intermittent connection and ultimately resulting in the reported leak; however, as the device was not returned for analysis this cannot be confirmed.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported loose/intermittent connection and the reported leak.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.D9, h3 - device returning status updated from unknown to no - retained by hospital.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in an unspecified artery.The indeflator was attempted to be used, however, a failure with the device valve was reported resulting in blood leakage.Three other indeflators from the same lot had the same issue of blood leakage.Another indeflator with a different lot was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported adverse patient effect and there was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.Subsequent to the initially filed reports, the following information was provided: the complaint device is a copilot and the device could not maintain the attachment due to loose connection with an unknown device.There was no adverse patient effect and there was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in an unspecified artery.The indeflator was attempted to be used, however, a failure with the device valve was reported resulting in blood leakage.Three other indeflators from the same lot had the same issue of blood leakage.Another indeflator with a different lot was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported adverse patient effect and there was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.Subsequent to the initially filed reports, the following information was provided: the complaint device is a copilot and the device could not maintain the attachment due to loose connection with an unknown device.There was no adverse patient effect and there was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned for analysis.The reported loose/intermittent connection and the reported leak were unable to be confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.As the reported leak was unable to be confirmed during returned device analysis, it is possible that the devices were not properly aligned and/or not fully connected/tightened while attempting to connect and/or the port of the device being connected was compromised resulting in the reported loose/intermittent connection and ultimately resulting in the reported leak; however, this cannot be confirmed.40 sterile/unused units were returned from the account (part #1003331 lot #60459943).13 out of the 40 returned sterile/unused devices were visually inspected with no anomalies noted.Functional testing was successfully performed on the 13 sterile/unused devices with no observations or anomalies noted.Potential factors which could contribute to a leak include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, mishandling, damage, loose connections or procedural technique.Factors that could contribute to connection issues include, but are not limited to, damage to the luer of the device, damage to the luer of the device being connected, or user technique/incorrect alignment of the devices.The product risk assessment identifies this as a foreseeable event; as such, design and manufacturing controls and mitigations have been established for potential causes.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported loose/intermittent connection and the reported leak.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.H6 correction: medical device problem code 1354 added.H6 correction: type of investigation code 4114 removed; 10 added.H6 correction: investigation findings code 213 removed; 114 added.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|