A male patient underwent an aquablation procedure for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph).Procept biorobotics corporation (procept) became aware that the patient had been diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis.It was reported that the patient received antibiotics before the diagnosis due to rash and swelling.A week after the aquablation procedure, the patient went to the emergency room, was diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis, and underwent additional surgery.The patient was reported to be in stable condition.No malfunction of the aquabeam robotic system was reported.
|
The aquabeam robotic system is a reusable device; therefore, it is still currently in possession of the user facility.The investigation of this event consisted of a review of the treatment log files, device history record (dhr), and labeling.The aquabeam robotic system's treatment logs file was reviewed, which confirmed no malfunctions during the aquablation procedure.A review of the device history record (dhr) for ab2000-b/serial number (b)(6) was performed, which confirmed that there were no nonconformances, failures, discrepancies, or missed steps during the manufacturing process that could be related to the reported event.The review indicated that the system met all design and manufacturing specifications when released for distribution.The aquabeam robotic system instructions for use (ifu), ifu0101-00, rev.E, was reviewed and states the following: 4.3.Warnings: procedure as with any surgical urologic procedure, potential perioperative risks of the aquablation procedure include: o infection a root cause for the reported event could not be determined.It was reported that the patient received antibiotics before the diagnosis due to rash and swelling.A week after the aquablation procedure, the patient went to the er, was diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis, and underwent additional surgery.The patient was reported to be in stable condition.The aquabeam robotic system ifu lists infection as a potential risk of the aquablation procedure.Based on the information received, plus a review of the event log file, ifu, and dhr, the event is considered not to be device-related.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
|