The following functional tests were performed: a field service engineer (fse) went onsite and recovered all of the elements necessary for the analysis of the reported incident.The complaint was escalated for technical investigation, and a product support engineer (pse) reviewed the data.The pse advised that the device did not alarm for low respiratory rate, because the alarm was off during the timeframe in question.Based on the information available and the testing conducted, the device was alarming as intended based on the user-selected settings, and there was no trouble found with the device.The reported problem was not confirmed.The device was confirmed to be operating per specifications and no failure was identified.If additional information is received the complaint file will be reopened.
|