|
Model Number 39467-175 |
Device Problems
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Output Problem (3005)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/20/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the rotation speed was unstable.The 75% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly tortuous and severely calcified first right posterolateral segment (rpl).A 2.00 mm rotapro was selected for use.The rotational speed was set to 180,000 rpm while outside the patient's body, but during advancement to the lesion site the rpm increased to 200,000.It was also noted that a puddle formed underneath the advancer as the burr appeared to leaking more fluid than usual.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications reported and the patient was stable after the procedure.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the rotation speed was unstable.The 75% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly tortuous and severely calcified first right posterolateral segment (rpl).A 2.00 mm rotapro was selected for use.The rotational speed was set to 180,000 rpm while outside the patient's body, but during advancement to the lesion site the rpm increased to 200,000.It was also noted that a puddle formed underneath the advancer as the burr appeared to leaking more fluid than usual.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications reported and the patient was stable after the procedure.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the rotation speed was unstable.The 75% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly tortuous and severely calcified first right posterolateral segment (rpl).A 2.00 mm rotapro was selected for use.The rotational speed was set to 180,000 rpm while outside the patient's body, but during advancement to the lesion site the rpm increased to 200,000.It was also noted that a puddle formed underneath the advancer as the burr appeared to leaking more fluid than usual.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications reported and the patient was stable after the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was returned for analysis.The advancer, handshake connections, sheath, coil, burr and annulus were visually examined.Inspection of the device found no damages or defects.Functional testing was then performed by connecting the advancer to the rotapro control console.During functional testing, the device was able to reach and maintain optimal rpm in both normal and dynaglide modes with no resistance or issues.During test rotation, no abnormal fluid leaks were noted from the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|