• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND ONYX FRONTIER; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND ONYX FRONTIER; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number ONYXNG50022UX
Device Problems Difficult to Advance (2920); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/15/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient presented to hospital with declining left ventricular function and shortness of breath (angina), for diagnostic cardiac catheterization.Indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (pci) was angina and congestive heart failure.An attempt was made to use one onyx frontier coronary drug eluting stent (des) to treat a moderately tortuous, moderately calcified lesion with 80% stenosis in the proximal right coronary artery (rca).The device was inspected with no issues.Negative prep was not performed.The lesion was pre-dilated with a 4.0x12mm balloon to 14atm.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.Resistance was noted while advancing the device.Excessive force was not used.It was reported that stent deformation occurred in vivo during positioning/advancement.The rca was engaged with a 6f guide catheter.A 300cm 0.014 non-medtronic (mdt) guidewire was advanced beyond the culprit lesion, distally in the vessel, without complication.Intravascular ultrasound (ivus) was performed with a non-mdt device.Difficulty was noted during advancement of the onyx frontier device through a telescope guide extension catheter before it reached the vessel.The stent system was pulled back, and the stent was deformed and partially dislodged off the balloon.A 5.0x18mm non-mdt stent was then used, and there were no issues when using this device and the same telescope device.The lesion was stented with the5.0x18mm non-mdt des to 12atm.The patient is alive with no injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the device was received for analysis.A kink was evident immediately distal to the luer.The stent had displaced proximally on the balloon and was not positioned on the balloon between the markerbands as per specifications.The proximal stent wraps were positioned over the proximal markerband.The stent was not positioned against the distal pillow as per specification.Crimp impressions were visible on the exposed balloon surface.Deformation was evident to the proximal and distal stent wrap with struts raised and bunched.The inner lumen patency was verified with a 0.015-inch mandrel.No other damage evident to the remainder of the device.Image analysis: fluoroscopic images show the presence of a tight lesion in the proximal rca.The lesion was pre-dilated with partial but not full resolution of the stenosis.No images were provided showing the attempted but unsuccessful delivery of the stent through the guide catheter and guide extension catheter.Only images of the vasculature were provided and it was reported that the stent did not enter the vasculature.A non-medtronic stent was delivered and deployed across the lesion.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: a pull was felt while advancing the stent through the guide and the telescope guide extension catheter.It was stated that the dislodgement occurred in the guide and that the stent never made it to the coronary arteries.The system was pulled back before advancing any further without any additional issues.The dislodged stent was removed by pulling the stent delivery system back out through the guide.Resistance was not noted during withdrawal of the device and excessive force was not used.There was no deformation noted to the telescope device and the replacement stent passed with no issues.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: annex d code added.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ONYX FRONTIER
Type of Device
STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key18501555
MDR Text Key332733861
Report Number9612164-2024-00217
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
UDI-Device Identifier00763000511814
UDI-Public00763000511814
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P160043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/13/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberONYXNG50022UX
Device Catalogue NumberONYXNG50022UX
Device Lot Number0011049800
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/28/2023
Initial Date FDA Received01/12/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/17/2024
01/30/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/24/2024
02/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured02/02/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age68 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight90 KG
-
-