• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. JUDE MEDICAL ENSITE¿ X AMPLIFIER; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CARDIAC MAPPING SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. JUDE MEDICAL ENSITE¿ X AMPLIFIER; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CARDIAC MAPPING SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number ENSITE-AMP-02
Device Problem Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/09/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During patient preparation for a pulmonary vein isolation procedure, and output issue occurred with the ensite x amplifier and the procedure was cancelled.There was an error message from ensite x system stating, "left leg electrode data module error.Reinsert the data module and revalidate.Contact abbott technical service if problem persists.¿ and it was not possible to validate.The data module was reinstated, new patches were used, the ensite x amplifier and the study were restarted, the cable slots were checked, but the issue did not resolve.The procedure could not continue because validation could not be performed.There were no patient consequences.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
One ensite x amplifier was received.Visual inspection revealed the front ports, rear ports, and chassis were free of physical damage.For evaluation purposes the port 3 and port 4 small form-factor pluggable (sfp) were temporarily exchanged.The amplifier was powered on and then the amplifier booted to a solid green ¿ready¿ light emitting diode (led) status.This indicated the amplifier passed the power-on-self-test (post) and then successfully communicated with the test station tracker software.The intra-cardiac (ic) short test was then performed and was successful.The amplifier was then connected to a wet lab, field frame, patient reference sensors, surflink, electrocardiogram (ecg) simulator, 10 lead ecg cable set, and a navx patch (set).The left leg was attached and was able to be validated with the test station (multiple use).The field service tool (fst) was then connected, and the amplifier passed post.The field functional test was then performed and was successful.The field reported event was not able to be duplicated.Evaluation testing was successful.Based on the information provided to abbott and the investigation performed, the reported event was not able to be confirmed, and the root cause remains undetermined.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed.No non-conformances associated with the reported event were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENSITE¿ X AMPLIFIER
Type of Device
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CARDIAC MAPPING SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL
one st. jude medical drive
st. paul MN 55117
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL
one st. jude medical drive
st. paul MN 55117
Manufacturer Contact
janna parks
5050 nathan lane north
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key18509921
MDR Text Key333140221
Report Number2184149-2024-00014
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQK
UDI-Device Identifier05415067034755
UDI-Public05415067034755
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K202066, K22
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/06/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberENSITE-AMP-02
Device Lot Number9169637
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/09/2024
Initial Date FDA Received01/14/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/20/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/06/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/07/2023
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-