Correction - h6 (clinical signs code, results code and conclusion code).The reported event could be confirmed based on available medical record and medical expert assessment.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.The device history record could not be reviewed because the affected device was not returned, and the lot number was not communicated.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed "the talar component shows a little radiolucence as well and there seems some condensed bone.However, there is also some artefacts which complicates the assessment.However, the surgeon does not report any loosening and therefore, with the given information, the component has to be assessed as being stable." based on the investigation, the root cause was attributed to a patient related issue.The failure was detected due to some radiolucency and condensed bone around the talar component.With the given information no loosening/migration can be confirmed and hence the component is assessed as stable according to the medical assessment by the hcp.If device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
|