|
Model Number 302-20 |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Device Contamination with Body Fluid (2317); Naturally Worn (2988)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/08/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
The patient underwent a full revision due to having a damaged lead.The suspect device was received and product analysis is underway.No other relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Livanova usa, inc.Submits this report to comply with 21 c.F.R.Part 803, the medical device reporting regulation, based on information that livanova has obtained, but may not have been able to investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.This report does not constitute an admission, or a conclusion by fda or anyone else, that the device, livanova, or livanovas employees caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any defects¿ or malfunctions¿.These words are incorporated into the fda 3500a medwatch form by the fda, and livanova objects to their use.
|
|
Event Description
|
Product analysis was completed on the returned lead and generator.Note that since a portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.The lead fracture allegation was not confirmed in the pa lab.Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed during the functional analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.Other than the abraded openings, the condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.Abrasions observed in various locations, possibly caused by wear.The lead assembly has dried remnants of what appear to have once been body fluids inside the outer and inner silicone tubes, in some areas; no obvious path of fluid ingress was noted other than the identified abraded openings and cut end.Generator analysis was completed and approved.An interrogation and system diagnostic tests were performed.The device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs and a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation (shows an ifi (intensified follow-up indicator)=no condition) was performed.No anomalies were seen, and the device performed according to functional specifications.There were no performance, or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|