STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR-UTAH-SALT LAKE CITY TREVO XP PROVUE 4MM X 30MM; CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 90185 |
Device Problem
Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/08/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3 other text : the subject device is unavailable to manufacturer.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the subject stent retriever was used for acute ais (acute ischemic stroke) procedure, as the cta (computed tomography angiography) showed a long occlusion at the left mca (middle cerebral artery).The operator-built access and then used the subject stent retriever to perform a thrombectomy.After the first attempt, the vessel was not completely clear, therefore; the second attempt was made, the big resistance was encountered when advancing the subject stent retriever into the retriever microcatheter.The subject stent retriever was removed from the patient's anatomy and found the distal of the subject stent retriever platinum coil was damaged.The operator replaced it with the catalyst catheter for aspiration and finished the procedure.No clinical consequences were reported to the patient due to this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
There are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.Visual inspection of the device was returned and the retriever platinum coil was noted to be broken to the distal end of the retriever shaped section.The retriever distal coil was kinked and there was resistance experienced in the attempt to advance the retriever into the microcatheter hub.Functional testing was performed as the insertion tool was flushed without difficulty.The core wire was advanced to push the retriever out of the insertion tool into the demo microcatheter hub with slight friction experienced.The retriever was expanded once advanced from the sheath without difficulty.The reported events were confirmed during analysis.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The device failed to meet specification when returned based on the damage noted.It was reported that after the first try, the vessel was not completely clear so the operator used it to do second try.However big resistance was encountered when advancing the stent to go into pro18 device, so the operator took the stent out and found distal of the stent was damaged.It is probable that the damage noted occurred during the initial retrieval attempt or during the attempt to re-load the retriever into the insertion tool or microcatheter.An assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to the reported 'retriever difficult/unable to to be advanced into catheter hub', 'retriever platinum wire damage/break' and to the analysed 'retriever platinum wire damage/break', 'retriever coils damaged' and 'retriever difficult/unable to be advanced into catheter hub', as the issue is associated with a product that meets stryker design and manufacture specifications and was used in according with the dfu but due to procedural and/or anatomical factors during use, the product performance was limited.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the subject stent retriever was used for acute ais (acute ischemic stroke) procedure, as the cta (computed tomography angiography) showed a long occlusion at the left mca (middle cerebral artery).The operator-built access and then used the subject stent retriever to perform a thrombectomy.After the first attempt, the vessel was not completely clear, therefore; the second attempt was made, the big resistance was encountered when advancing the subject stent retriever into the retriever microcatheter.The subject stent retriever was removed from the patient's anatomy and found the distal of the subject stent retriever platinum coil was damaged.The operator replaced it with the catalyst catheter for aspiration and finished the procedure.No clinical consequences were reported to the patient due to this event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|