As samples were not received for evaluation; the three (3) picture samples provided were utilized for analysis.The pictures showed damage to the blister packages.It is possible the observed damage resulted from poor perforation of the packages and/or poor separation of the blister packages.A device history record review was completed for provided material number 306572 and lot number 3285240.The review did identify two (2) non-conformances during the production process that may have contributed to this reported incident.The non-conformances were related to the perforation of the blister packages.Poor perforation was most likely caused by the cross-cut blade in the multivac machinery.This issue was resolved at the time of discovery and all affected product was scrapped.However, the issue may have been intermittently occurring prior to the point of discover; causing the involved product to be released.Regarding the separation of the blister packs, previous investigations have identified that this defect may be caused by the incorrect method of separation.It is recommended that blisters are separated on a horizontal plane.This is the first report received for this type of defect on material 306572 and lot 3285240.At this time, further action has not been determined necessary.Our quality team will continue to closely monitor the manufacturing process for signs of this potential defect and any emerging trends.
|