• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: IRHYTHM TECHNOLOGIES, INC ZIO AT; DETECTOR AND ALARM, ARRHYTHMIA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

IRHYTHM TECHNOLOGIES, INC ZIO AT; DETECTOR AND ALARM, ARRHYTHMIA Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Unspecified Heart Problem (4454)
Event Date 12/13/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The zio at device was returned, and the and the clinical data was downloaded.A review of the clinical data found that the patient wore the zio at device for 13 days of the 14-day prescribed wear period.Irhythm became aware of the misclassified arrhythmia while preparing the final report and notified the hcp on day 24.The diagnostic data indicates that no functional issues were observed for the device around the time of the specified episode.Analysis of device logs found that the device performed as intended with no performance or functional issues noted.The investigation revealed that the certified cardiographic technician (cct) misclassified the event and the physician subsequently agreed with the cct interpretation of hgavb.The zio at clinical reference manual states in the ¿indications for use¿ section that ¿the reports are provided for review by the intended user to render a diagnosis based on clinical judgment and experience.¿ this event is being reported per 21cfr803 as a serious injury.This report does not constitute an admission by rhythm that the product described in this report has any defects, or has malfunctioned.These terms are included in form fda 3500a and are fixed terms for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.This report is being filed in an abundance of caution.
 
Event Description
The patient experienced an arrhythmia that met medical doctor notification (mdn) requirements that was not communicated during the wear period.The investigation revealed that a preliminary ecg interpretation provided to the physician was misclassified.Following the wear period and while compiling the final report, the interpretation was amended.The healthcare provider (hcp) was immediately notified, and irhythm learned that the patient had received a pacemaker.It is unknown if the pacemaker was indicated by other symptoms and/or test results.Several good faith attempts were made to acquire additional information but with no result.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZIO AT
Type of Device
DETECTOR AND ALARM, ARRHYTHMIA
Manufacturer (Section D)
IRHYTHM TECHNOLOGIES, INC
699 8th st suite 600
san francisco CA 94103
Manufacturer (Section G)
IRHYTHM TECHNOLOGIES, INC
6550 katella avenue, suite 200
cypress CA 90630
Manufacturer Contact
mazi kiani
699 8th st suite 600
san francisco, CA 94103
9494132147
MDR Report Key18539610
MDR Text Key333179360
Report Number3007208829-2024-00026
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K163512
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Expiration Date02/04/2024
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/19/2023
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/22/2023
Initial Date FDA Received01/18/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/08/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age84 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-